|
June 8,
2003
A
column in response to Mr. Tim Anderson
By: Nelson Thibodeaux,
Publisher AND Editor (at this time)
It has
been a little while since I wrote a column, but reader beware, Mr.
Anderson has graciously asked some very revealing questions. One
would hope that this can be the future approach in Colleyville, that is
ask questions, get input and agree or disagree, but keep the
communication lines open in a civil manner.
Addressing
the Questions
1) what is your name?
2) what is the name of the current editor?
3) how many times in the past year was a "view," or
opinion, or posting, or quote (or whatever you want to call it)
posted that is attributed to Mrs. Newton?
Blue Underlined below
indicates a link to another page or email. |
1) what is your name?
The following information
clearly identifies the Publisher and appears on the Front
Page of LNO 24/7, 365 days/year. I also publish
the hardcopy North East Tarrant Monthly, a newspaper
dedicated to promoting local businesses to consumers in
Colleyville, Grapevine, Keller and Southlake. June
will be the 4th issue. Look for it in the mail! We also
invite you to visit AboutMyHOA.com,
the neighborhood site and North
East Tarrant.com, a listing of local businesses with
search capabilities by name and by
keywords. |
Contact
LNO
© 2001-2003 Local
News Only.com (tm)
Copyright - All rights reserved

Nelson
Thibodeaux, Publisher
Journalism &
Communications Background/Experience
Radio Journalism KAYC, KKAS,
KTRM, KPNG, WQXI
Broadcast Television ABC-KBMT Television
Cable Television - Gardner Communications, SatShare Communications,
Consumer Communications - Communications Gateway, WinStar
Communications,
Authored Featured Columns have appeared in: Beaumont
Enterprise, Fort Worth Star, Dallas Morning News, Orlando Sentinel,
North East Tarrant County Magazine, National Country Music, Entertainment:
Producer Grapevine Opry 1984-1987
Internet News - Local News Only.com established May 2001
First Chairman of the Colleyville TIF District, Member Crime Control
Board and Historical Liaison, Colleyville City Council 1998-2000
Mayor Pro Tem 1999
|
2) what is the name of the
current editor?
The following email and
Publisher's note was posted on April 27, 2003 and remains
accessible at all times in the Archived
2003 emails . I believe you will find it addresses
this question. |
April 27, 2003 8:38 am
Nelson,
When you resigned from LNO because of a U. S. Justice Department
indictment against you, I asked "editor@LocalNewsOnly.com"
to publish information about LNO. The information requested--editor(s),and
publisher, is normally provided by newspapers and newsletter.
Newspapers and newsletter frequently provide a listing of the
professional staff.
Since your acquittal and return to LNO, part of the information
requested is now available. You are listed as the publisher.
It is about time for the remainder of that request to be answered.
Thanks,
Jo Ann Gasper
[You may not be aware that I sent several emails to "editor@LocanNewsOnly.com."
My email was not published. I did receive a response that LNO was
under going a change in format and the information would be
forthcoming. The Publisher information is now available.]
Publisher/Editor Note: All
emails received are posted to our knowledge. Unlike letters
sent to the editor of your favorite newspaper, LNO strives to post
virtually all input. However, LNO reserves the right NOT to
post any item that we consider offensive to the family values of our
site or whereby LNO is not comfortable about the validity of the
authorship. LNO is a pioneering effort to report local news on the
Internet. What other newspapers may do "frequently"
is not necessarily of interest, concern or somehow establishes that
LNO is under any obligation for similar disclosures.
In addition, despite recent "federal bureaucratic type smelling
overreach" requirements voted into a burdensome paperwork by
Colleyville's current city council, prying into every aspect of
private and financial life (if one desires to serve the public by
being a candidate for city council); that mandate does not yet
reach private businesses in Colleyville. Therefore, in regards
to your statement "It is about time for the remainder of that
request to be answered," LNO is not obligated to answer
anything. For example, is your interest equally as intensive about
the Colleyville Courier? When the Colleyville Courier
publishes their financial investors, shareholders, and an
explanation of their offices located with the partner of the Village
Developer, then ask us again!
However, in the spirit of addressing our 75,000 views per month, LNO
will share the following information; Currently I act as
both the Publisher and Editor of LNO. Contributing research,
writers, technical, marketing, reporters, graphic artists,
photographers and regularly contributing columnists include:
Marc Troop, Maria H. Jones, Debbie Roach, Raven Thibodeaux, Steve
Mongithetti, Jan Klodner, Linda Baker, Sandy Compton, Kimberly
Connor, Jessica Kehmel, and Kelly Kosikowski.
Nelson Thibodeaux
Publisher/Editor
|
| 3) how many times in the
past year was a "view," or opinion, or posting, or
quote (or whatever you want to call it) posted that is
attributed to Mrs. Newton?
I do not mean to pick on Mrs. Newton. However, your point that
she is no longer the editor establishes I used the wrong word
(editorial) in my previous posting. Do you mean to imply she
posted nothing?
I searched the site, (as any
viewer can do with the search feature) for the name
"Linda Newton". Then I used an internal page
search for "Linda Newton". The following are
the last two postings of any article, column or
contributions by Linda Newton, based on the search.
|
The last contribution of
Mrs. Newton was posted April 10, 2003 a column titled, "BOYCOTTING
DIMINISHES ONE’S RIGHT TO CRITICIZE"
. I also checked the Column
Page. This page lists links to columns as far back as August
2002. There were no other columns by Mrs. Newton. Prior to
April 10, 2003, the last article authored by Mrs. Newton was on June
10, 2002, Pleasant
Run Schools Holds 27th Reunion.
On
May 18, 2001, Linda Newton wrote a column titled, "Reflections
on why I accepted this position, and my relationship with Nelson
Thibodeaux" Should
you decide to click on this title and read her column, I believe you
will find it consistent with the Publisher's Note after your most
recent email.
I
can only infer from your questions that you have been under the
impression that somehow Mrs. Newton has directly or surreptitiously
been "ghost writing" articles or columns for LNO.
After my federal indictment in May 2002, and considering the
fact I would not agree to plea to some lesser offense offered by the
federal government, I was diverted fighting for
my God given freedom as an American. I was not able to continue
in a very active role. At the time Mrs. Newton felt it best she
step down as Editor in June 2002. We initially planned on a
former Colleyville resident, with newspaper experience, to take over
as Editor. However, physical distance of the new Editor and my
inability to provide local support resulted in the position never
materializing like we had hoped. I was totally vindicated of any
and all charges, (as were all the defendants on all 110 trumped up
felony counts), I became very active serving both roles as publisher
and editor. Hopefully, we will be in a position to recruit a new
Editor in the near future.
When
Linda Newton became Editor of LNO, neither of us had any idea that
Richard Newton would run for public office again. However, when
he made that decision, full disclosure of Linda's relationship with
Mr. Newton was provided on LNO.
Further,
Linda Newton as Editor, insisted that news articles be totally
documented. Those documents were made available to readers to validate
the posted news article (and many times even with columns) thereby
providing full disclosure concerning the source of LNO's information. If
the writing was a column and not a news story, it was and is
identified as such on LNO. During the time Linda was
editor, Richard Newton won two elections for city council. The
first to fill the un-expired term of Dennis Marlin and then he won a
full term in the general election. Mr. Marlin had replaced
Thibodeaux on city council and resigned after it was disclosed he was
arrears in his taxes to the city.
|
| While
you preface your comments with, "
I'd also enjoy learning some additional historical facts:" In
the next series of "questions", while asking for
facts, there is much more room for interpretation.
Therefore, it should be noted that the following answers are my
opinion of the facts and my personal answers to your questions. I
appreciate the questions and the opportunity to respond. |
|
1) if Colleyville were to have been successful in creating a project
that would have attracted the "upscale" and very successful
tenants now residing at Southlake Town Center, when would this
decision reasonably have had to been made and who was on the city
council at that time? This implies the decision would have been
made prior to any communicated plan by Southlake to build their
Town Center. |
Comparing
Southlake Town Center's success to any existing or
potential commercial development in Colleyville is not a fair
comparison. No site in Colleyville can compare with the
tenant appeal of the Southlake Town Center, or other commercial
areas of Hwy 1709 and Hwy 114.
The Southlake Town Center has excellent transportation, traffic
flow, adequate parking, a pedestrian friendly design and a real
commitment to attract tenants to their major center. Nothing in Colleyville
even comes close, has ever come close, or ever will come close
to these dynamics in the future.
The parcel of land in Colleyville that had the best potential to
have attracted the tenants is the Smith property at Hall Johnson
and Hwy 26. This was the property identified as the
epicenter of Colleyville and a growing large consumer
base. For more than a decade, prior to my election to city
council in 1998, this property was in the Master Plan as
Colleyville's downtown. The property included about a 100
acres of contiguous land. The site would include a city
campus to incorporate the property already donated by Herman
Smith where the Colleyville Center now stands. The vision
planned included the Center, city hall, a justice center and
library. The public buildings would surround a dramatic
boulevard with the city hall anchoring the street at the
termination. Retail buildings would be pedestrian
friendly, lush landscaping, ample parking and upscale architecture. Respected
retail experts explained to city council on many occasions
that nothing would development until the property had better
traffic access, at least to the east, e.g. Hall Johnson road
completed through to the Grapevine improvements.The challenge
facing council was the
City of Colleyville simply had no money to pay for a Hall
Johnson improvement or
promote the city to potential tenants.
After careful study of potential financial solutions and a
citizen's group gave their input, I explored
the concept of a Tax Increment Financing District (TIF) with
City Manager Bob Stripling. Bob brought in the city
financial consultant and Colleyville resident Jim Sabonis and a
plan of action was established.
The City of Colleyville would approach our taxing partners, e.g.
GCISD, Hospital District, County and Tarrant College, and
request they agree to a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District
for Colleyville. A TIF would allow the city to set aside a
district and have the use of taxes collected by all the other
taxing entities, with the most important one being GCISD. The
TIF funds is that amount of increased property taxes in
the district after a date certain in time. In
Colleyville's case the period began January 2000.
One challenge facing
Colleyville was the fact Colleyville had NO PROJECT! For
example, a TIF was instrumental in the Grapevine Mills
Mall, the Gaylord Opry Hotel, and the Southlake Town Center.
However
Colleyville had no such identifiable project.
Therefore, a conceptual plan had to be drawn up based on the
Master Plan and Mayor Richard Newton was faced with the task of
getting the other taxing entities to go along with a
"vision" in lieu of a specific project. This was
no easy task! To further complicate matters, the state legislature was
about to change TIF legislation that would alter the ability to
protect these tax funds from Robin Hood statutes. Therefore, the sense of urgency was real
and the lack of a project problematic. In 1999, Mayor
Newton convinced these other entities to agree to a TIF
that could help Colleyville energize commercial development on
the Hwy 26 corridor. To maximize the potential for the
city, Mayor Newton identified a TIF area much larger than just
the originally planned downtown. While the emphasis would
remain on the Smith property planned downtown development, the
city could assist smaller projects along the corridor as
well.
The agreed TIF included over 600
acres along Hwy 26, a $35 million tax windfall for
Colleyville. Instead of the originally planned downtown
area, after a change in city council majority, the lions share
of the TIF eventually went to the Village at Colleyville.
The TIF concept was to use
incentives and attract the right kind of developers, especially
to the center of downtown. The Hall Johnson project was
the first move to establish Colleyville as a destination for
attractive tenants. However, the 1998-2000 city council was well aware there
could be misunderstandings and opposition to the widening of
Hall Johnson. Therefore, 9 public hearings were held on
the design. A plan was developed to have the minimum
impact on neighborhoods. The eventual design saved all existing
brick walls and allocated over $600,000 for landscaping.
This was the ONE road compromise that HAD to be made to have any
realistic chance of getting a major retail center in
Colleyville. That compromise is now the beautifully landscaped
Hall Johnson.
The vote to move forward on Hall Johnson was passed 4 to 1, with
Councilman Tigue voting nay and emotionally charging that other
city council members had somehow "hornswoggled" the
citizens. The majority of that council had the courage to
make the right decision for the long term benefit of the
city. However, Colleyville would made national news just a
few months after the vote.
But then came the election of 2000. The "anti
Wal-Mart protest election about a phantom big box and Hall Johnson pay back election". Voters
were being told that I had a financial interest in Burk Collins
proposed project that included a Neighborhood Grocery, which was
a "big box." Neither statement being true.
I not only had no financial interest,
I was only remotely familiar with the plans. The project
had not been voted on by P&Z and I made it my policy to
allow this Board to do its work before I commented on any
project. However, the plans certainly NEVER contemplated
the typical definition of a "big box."
During that election, developer Raman Chandler anonymously
put out the infamous "Liar Flyer".
The same TIF now described as the best deal to ever happen to
Colleyville, was then described to voters as a $35 million tax
on the citizens! And falsely claimed, (a battle cry that one
continued to hear at elections for two more years) that I wanted
to build a "cow museum" costing the tax payers $11
million.
Just to clear that matter up once and for all. McPherson
Park still stands undeveloped and unusable to the public more
than 4 years after fear mongering influenced citizens to turn
their back on the Dairy Museum project and turn me out of
office. Historically Colleyville is dairy country. The
Dairy Farmers of America wanted to relocate their East Texas
museum to an area of higher population. They were willing
to take the lead with financial assistance, foundation fund
raising efforts and technical support. Discussions were
underway to fund the museum with $100,000 allocated for manpower
every year. The McPherson Farm was a dairy farm. The
McPherson Dairy Museum was not planned based on using one cent
of taxpayer funds. The city development of McPherson
Park would have primarily been dedicated as an open park for all
citizens. A serene setting, with a pond, jersey milk cows,
open air concert, picnic tables, open recreational areas,
jogging trails and none of the park would be subject to some
sports organization's whim to determine who could play and who
could not. The Dairy Museum was projected as being a "PROFIT
CENTER" for the city, similar to concepts such as NRH2O
in North Richland Hills.
The Dairy Museum became the sacrificial lamb of those with a
lack of vision but an abundance of political spin abilities
during election season. When it comes to "preserving
the rural atmosphere" of Colleyville, some limit the
definition to crumbling two lane black top roads with bar
ditches, and high density housing, versus a preservation of our
historical heritage. The Dairy Museum would have put
the City of Colleyville on the map as having a unique
attraction. School buses would bring children to learn
milk is not developed in a milk jug. Meeting rooms,
events, a source of pride, all the victim of visionaries that
preferred $22.5 million be spent in the Village at Colleyville
that creates additional tax burdens for citizens and includes
$15 million for public buildings that will never generate a
profitable cent in the future for Colleyville.
This is in comparison to a project that would have sent a signal
to developers that the Western Gateway of Colleyville along
Precinct Line Road (and near the new Dairy Museum) is open for
business and looking for major retail interest.
However, the 2000 election saw the election of Dennis Marlin for my
seat (he resigned before his 2 year term was completed), the
re-election of Ginny Tigue and the introduction of Dana Feldman
to city council.
Within one month Mayor Donna Arp
threatened to veto the bond sales to build Hall Johnson and
Ginny Tigue made national news when she suggested part of the
road be covered with dirt and then then new council actually took her idea under
serious consideration. Within six months Patsy Smith was suddenly a
gold digger for agreeing to donate property for city hall and as
quick as you can say, "take care of your personal developer
buddy", city hall AND the library were relocated to the
Village at Colleyville.
The Town Center on 100 Smith acres with Hwy 26 frontage suddenly took a back seat to the 24 acre Village at
Colleyville with virtually no Hwy 26 frontage. The city traded Park Land for alleged open
space in the Village, then there was a land swap and things
really got interesting. The developer obtained paperwork
from the city allowing him to claim a $555,000
tax write off and the Village eventually ends up with $7.5
million in reimbursements to cover infrastructure. Then
millions in bonds were
sold to build both the library and city hall in the
Village. While the Town Center, with a Master Plan in
place for over a decade, received no attention, the
Village gets over $22 million in tax related incentives,
including public buildings. All of these debt creating
actions without any vote by the citizens.
In the meantime, the Justice
Center was being built, as originally planned in the Town
Center, and is being paid
for out of a 1/2 cent sales tax approved by the voters.
The Village at Colleyville was
actually approved BEFORE the Town Center in
Southlake.
The tenants that
went to the Southlake Town Center had ever opportunity to
consider Colleyville's Village. Many tenants that
initially expressed interest in the Village ended up at the
Southlake Town Center. While the Village's unique, "you
build your own store and live above it concept" apparently
doesn't resonate with national chains with little interest in
becoming a landlord and having their executives live above their
store. The tenants
overwhelmingly chose the Southlake location pointing out problems
with narrow streets, inadequate parking and access with the
Colleyville experiment.
The readers may remember the famous "Boutique Hotel"
announced right before election two years ago. In fact,
many people actually think that city hall and the library, or
one of the other buildings, is going to be a hotel. Back
then when LNO attempted to talk to the hotel
"developer" about the project, Councilmember Ginny
Tigue said that I had "some gall" and that I was
simply a negative person with a negative news site. You
will note however there is no hotel, no discussion of any hotel
and no explanation. In fact, there is not one major brand
anchor retailer in the Village or a whisper of a possibility
there ever will be one.
Finally, on the last vote of the
previous council in April 2003, the Colleyville Town Center received
only $2.5 million in incentives. Richard Newton supported the
vote. I adamantly opposed the decision then and now.
There is no longer a vision of a downtown on the Smith
property. The tremendous talents of architect Charlie
Hodges (The Quarry in San Antonio, the Arboretum in Austin) have
been wasted. Because the initial Master Plan was ignored,
because there will now be no destination plaza built, because
city hall was moved, because of vicious campaign rhetoric that a
Wal-Mart big box was going on the property and because of the
anti-business climate in Colleyville, the vision for a dynamic
downtown has been lost.
Instead we have the first two real big boxes being built in
Colleyville. The 45,000 sq. ft. United Market grocery and
the Lifetime Fitness Center, a
110,000 sq. ft. giant
exercise, spa, et.al. being built on the property.
It is interesting that Colleyville's new Mayor Joe Hocutt was endorsed by Mayor Arp,
and referred to
United Market as an example of his ability to attract business
to the city during his campaign. While another element of
his campaign included the redundant old fear mongering,
perfected by Mayor Arp and Ms. Tigue, that his opponents would
build 4 lane roads in everyone's back yards while he would
preserve the 2 lane crumbling asphalt, bar ditch lined roads for
eternity.
The fact is, United Market would have never built on the Smith
parcel if Hall Johnson was still a 2 lane road. Mayor
Hocutt, former Mayor Arp and Councilmember Ginny Tigue rush to
take credit for United Market, when they have been a part of the
coalition that has opposed Hall Johnson, used it to get
re-elected and have virtually ignored this parcel in favor of
the Village for three years. The Village gets $7.5 million
incentives and $15 million in public buildings, guaranteed by
taxpayers, without a vote. The Town Center gets a belated
$2.5 million to attract a giant spa and a Justice Center paid
for from a sales tax approved by the voters.
There is little hope that "Mr. Colleyville" Herman
Smith's vision will every be a reality. The once in a
lifetime opportunity was a TIF framed by public servants the
voters have now voted off the dais city council island.
The TIF tax dollars have been squandered on an social experiment
involving residential lofts over retail stores offering no
parking, no promotion and no future. Unfortunately
Colleyville's new Town Center businesses; an upscale grocery
store, a wholesale lighting store and a monolith workout center are not
the type of facilities that projects a visionary downtown
square. They are in fact grouping of big box type stores,
which seem contrary to the very argument that former Mayor Arp
used to scuttle the Burk Collins Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market on
Cheek-Sparger. Only thing is, that the Neighborhood Market
was and is NOT in fact a big box Super Wal-Mart. Allowed
to proceed, the Collins development would have already been up
and running generating sales taxes and featuring a new city park
for citizens of Colleyville as part of the overall
project. Instead, one can admire the visual aesthetics of
a closed gas station and closed Payless in lieu of the
referenced development.
Since Colleyville Town Center developers Charlie Hodges and Rob Ferrell are practical businessmen,
they have made the best purse they can now make out of this
pig's ear. There will be other retailers that come into
the Town Center, the project will meet with success
eventually. It will however NOT be the downtown
Colleyville so desperately needed for both financial reasons but
also for the identity and bonding of the community. It will not have a beautiful public plaza, it will be
simply another strip type retail center with a few landscape
bushes to break up the vast asphalt parking lots.
$7.5 million for the Village experiment, millions for public
buildings or $2.5 million to attract a giant work out center gut
the very vision and purpose of the TIF.
Drive by the new Justice Center and Colleyville Center. You can
see a remnant of what could have been. Now imagine the City Hall
surrounded by water, fountains, landscaping and retail stores
where one could easily walk from one to another and an area for
public gatherings, concerts and festivals.
The $35 million in TIF funds has virtually been committed.
Ask yourself, are you happy with the stewardship of the last
three years? Are you happy how the money was spent?
Are you happy about the look, size, type and amount of
commercial development? I think not. For those
of us that shared the vision and found the formula to actually
create the dream, we are devastated there will never be that
beautiful downtown with wide open spaces. In other words,
after the framer of the TIF was voted out of office, it only
took three years to commit all the TIF money to personal
favorite projects. Substantial TIF dollars have now been
diverted to finance the ever increasing capital requirements of
the Library and City Hall in lieu of using the money to attract
businesses that in turn pay sales taxes that in turn could have
paid for the Library and City Hall in the future. By
the way, all debts were done with General Obligation Bonds with
NO vote of the citizens, backed by your personal home property
taxes. All Colleyville taxpayers are stakeholders in the
Village and now, to a much lesser extent, the Town Center.
Just as a side note, do you think your school district taxes are
pretty high? Here is a question, how would you feel if you
knew that millions of dollars of your school district taxes were
used to build Grapevine's City Hall? I am sure when residents of
adjacent cities, paying taxes to GCISD, actually realize that
their tax dollars have help build Colleyville's Library and City
Hall, there will be some tough questions to answer. Part
of the TIF agreement did include the payback of $8 million of
the $35 million to help retire the last GCISD Bond Issue,
however since the TIF began in 2000, GCISD has not received one
penny toward retiring that debt from Colleyville's TIF
District.
The TIF was to be used to make
Colleyville's commercial downtown center a destination
location. It was NOT to put it sewers, roads and cover
basic costs that should have been the developer's
responsibility. In other words, the
funds were to provide amenities that a developer might not be
able to justify from a ROI approach. The funds WERE to
ENHANCE the architecture of building, provide open areas, and
yes, build fountains. In fact, part of the concept was to
construct a $2 million interactive Plaza in the middle of
downtown. If you may, a Mustangs of Las Colinas for
Colleyville. We would attract shoppers to our city to also see
and enjoy our amenities.
You can drive through the Village
and marvel at the narrow streets, no parking and sewer
system. However, I am very certain these attractions are
not likely to make Colleyville an icon for new shoppers.
Which is of a concern considering, if the Village does not
create at least $75 million in property values, your home
property taxes is the stop gap. Of course, the already
limited area of the Village is now limited even more with a huge
library and city hall, which diminishes the potential of the
very project that is supposed to pay for these public edifices. |
2) I recall a debate years ago re: Walmart. I don't recall the
year. Was this before or after Walmart built a very attractive
"big box" store in Southlake, only to make their recent
decision to abandon that location and move elsewhere (Grapevine)?
What was your position on the Walmart debate at that time? Given
Southlake appears to have found a new tenant (Circuit City, I believe)
for the
vacated site, why can't Colleyville find a new tenant for the vacated
equivalent big boxes (KMart, Payless - I know, Jerry Jones bought it)?
|
| If
you are talking about the Wal-Mart debate in Colleyville, I
wasn't even aware I was a part of the debate until election day
May 2000. This is the "mob mentality" vote, I
have referred to, (not that the voters were a mob as Dave Lieber
wrote in error). Dennis Marlin, had been embraced by the anti-Wal-Marters
and committed to voting against anything even remotely
associated with the Wal-Mart corporation, regardless of its
actual look or use. I never had the opportunity to address
the issue, because I wasn't asked about it until the day of the
election. The anti-Wal-Mart leader (we don't want the kind
of people that would shop there in Colleyville) Steve Knight
asked me if I would commit to vote against the Wal-Mart.
When I told him no because I was not familiar with the details,
he said that is all he needed to know to oppose my re-election
to city council.
Those who voted against
me about this issue can feel comfortable with their
decision. After seeing the plans, the park and
understanding how critical this project was to a number of
senior citizens, I would have voted for the project. I
dare say that many who were fooled into thinking the Collins
project was a "big box", would not object to the real
plans for the site. In fact, a recent study in Garland
concluded that the Neighborhood Market offered value to shoppers
that resulted in a 38% to 42% savings over the same items at
Kroger's and Albertson's.
The rejection of the Collins project rung out like the shot
heard around the retail world. The most damaging aspect
was not that Colleyville would oppose a "big box"
Super Wal-Mart, but that the citizens were fooled by their
elected officials. Knowing how difficult it is to do business in
Colleyville, developers virtually stared at Colleyville in disbelief as the Collins project went down in flames. The
general feeling was if the elected officials would misrepresent
the project intentionally, what chance did any developer have to
make an honest presentation of their plans?
You can't fight city hall, especially when elected officials can
use the bully pulpit to virtually incite a riot. There was
NEVER a rational public discussion of the pros and cons of this
project.
One source told me that the Wal-Mart corporation is not one of
the largest and most successful in the world by being bullied by
small town tyrants. I was told that the city would simply
be surrounded by Wal-Mart's presence, but not enjoy any tax
dollars. By golly, when Sam's is completed on Hwy 26 in
Grapevine, the encirclement is complete. Super Target out
rushed Wal-Mart to Glade Road so Wal-Mart apparently felt short one
Super store. But the promise has been fulfilled, there is
a Wal-Mart entity on every corner of the city sucking huge tax dollars
out of Colleyville.
The primary reasons
Colleyville can't find new tenants are:
1.) Anti-business reputation and history of elected officials
misrepresenting projects for their personal political gain
during elections.
2.) Constant rhetoric from
city elected officials that they "don't want people driving
through their town". Although adjacent city residents
ARE going to drive through Colleyville, the city is still a part
of the State of Texas, County of Tarrant with free access of
roads.
3.) Poor traffic flow options.
4.) No ability to use TIF $ as incentives, the funds are already
committed.
5.) Attractive locations in adjacent cities where the
retailer does not have to face a hostile process AND they
will get Colleyville shoppers anyway.
6.) A recent history of declining
sales taxes that detour potential retailers from even
considering Colleyville. No retailer wants to get into a long
term commitment in a declining commercial area. |
|
3) In your opinion, why did Payless Cashways, KMart, and others
(mostly fast food places, and a gas station, I think) leave
Colleyville? What facts can you present? |
I
believe factors for all of the examples you listed factors were probably
different. Obviously the corporate failures of Payless and
K-Mart extended beyond the city limits of Colleyville.
Food places have told me they find it difficult to sustain a
profitable operation in Colleyville because of the small amount
of lunch traffic.
There will always be factors the city or elected officials can
not control when an individual business goes out of
business. However, even a casual observer can see
Colleyville has lost successful franchise operations that rarely
see closed units in other areas.
The orchestrated response, to criticism of the economic
policies, that these closures are a "transition" to a
better day with more sophisticated retailers is a cover story
with no merit. This kind of ill-advised comment once again
discourages new business from exploring Colleyville because it
smacks of exclusionary elitist snobbism and has no clear cut
rules of engagement.
What is more important is what happens when a city experiences a
serious lost of business. When you have a robust
commercial area with an obvious success record, there are other
retailers that will backfill. Southlake lands Circuit
City, etc. in the old Wal-Mart building. What made this
possible also was the public statements by elected officials
that they did not want to see Wal-Mart leave town.
Contrast that with the statements of elected officials in
Colleyville that they don't want a Wal-Mart related entity in
their city regardless of what it looks like or offers to
consumers.
In other words, the elected Colleyville officials, put into office by about
1,500 voters, snub their noses at the most successful retailer
in the history of America.
Southlake loses a business then aggressively pursues a
replacement with demographics, incentives, traffic flow and
attitudes that contribute to a high level of potential success.
Since the rumor was that Payless was going to be a "Big
Lots" store, one has to wonder what Jerry Jones could be
thinking. Let me get this straight, elected officials drum
out of town a grocery store because of its corporate entity, not
because of its operations or size. Now a bottom feeder
retailer like Big Lots is coming to Colleyville and that'll be
OK by the same elected officials! Don't hold your breath. |
|
4) what specifically do you propose, in rank order, as being the Top 5
issues the City of Colleyville should focus on? What
specifically is your clearly defined stand and proposed specific
solution for these issues? |
1.) Financial Condition of Colleyville: Adopt a 5 year financial
plan that incorporates the millions in Certificates of
Obligation debt incurred over the past three years. The plan
should project out a worse and best case scenario of property
and sales tax revenue. Despite what some previous elected
officials would have you believe, the city's credit card is
charged to the maximum and the bill is going to come due.
Colleyville has maintained a good financial rating because of the work
of city councils in years past. The rating certainly was not obtained
as a result of the heavy debt incurred over the past three
years. The financial plan should include a capital improvement
plan, an overview of personnel needs and include a budget for an
experienced Economic Development Director. This 5 year
plan should be considered as an important Master Guide for the
city and respected as a document that must be referenced prior
to any additional commitments made on a whim and a prayer by the
current or succeeding city councils.
2.) An Objective and Intensive Review of TIF Agreements: I
believe the taxpayers have a right to know where their money is
going. For example, the Village at Colleyville should be
required to reveal all financial partners at any level involved
with the project. Considering the success of the Village
is critical to retire the massive debt load, the city should
require a complete audited financial statement of
operations. From a casual view one might speculate the
Village has not met with great economic success in the private
sector. The biggest third party investor is the city, i.e.
the taxpayers, of Colleyville. Only when the city has a
full and complete disclosure of the financial condition can
meaningful discussions take place on how the city and the
private sector work best together. If the Village
development is in financial straits, as has been rumored, the
very last thing the city needs is a surprise financial collapse
and the prospect of dealing with a new owner overnight. A strategic plan to promote the success of
the Village, based on open books by the developer, should then
be incorporated with the help of a new Economic Development
Department. Finally, attempt to renegotiate with GCISD
concerning the $8 million due from Colleyville's TIF funds. These funds
could be used for specific innovative revenue generation
projects that could return more for all the taxing entities in
the future.
3.) Hwy 26 Expansion: It
is amazing to me that the same elected officials that decry any
improvement, such as adding a turn lane to a city road,
exuberantly embrace the expansion of Hwy 26 to a six lane,
median burdened, super highway. The effort is virtually
controlled by the state, yet is costing $5 million of the city's
TIF funds. Somehow this expansion is supposed to help
Colleyville businesses? The ability to have multiple lanes
to more quickly get through town with the inability to easily
make turns is a preferred solution? The overhead utilities
WILL NOT be buried because that would cost another $13
million. Some of the intersections will have brick
designs, but who will see them? Not likely to have many pedestrians
walking down a major highway with no sidewalk. A better
solution would be a much less expensive turn lane down the
entire length of Hwy 26, improvements to the signal light
coordination and elimination of bar ditches. Spend the $5
million to enhance the beauty and make it safer to access Hwy 26
businesses. Instead, there is about to be launched three
years of sheer construction terror for businesses and pure hell for
commuters. I thought Colleyville citizens did not want to
build roads simply to have folks cut through the city!
Well guess what, your elected officials have embraced the mother
of all pass through roads. I would suggest this program be
stopped in its tracks with a solution less expensive and more
practical for Hwy 26 businesses. Otherwise, things are
going to get a lot worse and may never get better for some.
4.) Support City Wide Events: The
first Celebrate Colleyville in 1999 drew 5,000 people. It
was so successful the council decided to establish a marketing
position with the direction of making the function into a
city-wide event. In addition, the position was to be
directed to work with local businesses to increase communication
with the city. A summer Bar-B-Que event was also to be
explored. The position was hired after the 2000 election
and the job function
changed. These events need a full time coordinator to plan
out the activities, direct citizens obtaining sponsorships and
involve commercial enterprises throughout the city. There has
been an obvious lack of enthusiastic support from the chamber
and previous Mayor Arp. The singular reason has to be the
founder of the event, Nelson and Jamie Thibodeaux. Get over
it! Lets expand our attractions like other cities.
Instead the event originally planned for two days has been
squeezed down to three hours. A full court press should be
made to establish successful events in the city. They will
benefit our businesses, that in turn benefit sales taxes and
finally helps bond a community together. The marketing efforts
should replace any thought that a local chamber with about 72%
membership outside the city is likely to be the best cheerleader
for Colleyville businesses. The city must take the lead
with its own businesses and not spend another dime with a
chamber more interested in fund raising to pay their executives
than promoting Colleyville business.
5.) Restore Citizens
Committees: While on city council, I initiated the
Citizens Committee for Economic Development. Every
applicant was invited to join. The result was open
discussions with many ideas. A spirit of getting something
done amongst a diverse group became the underlying theme.
The result of this committee was the decision to move forward on the Tax
Increment Financing District, as well as, the initial approval of
the Village at Colleyville plans. The last three years citizens
committees have been non-existent or stacked with individuals
considered not a political threat to the existing elected
officials. The results have been as expected.
|
|
5) Unless answered above, what is your specific view on commercial
building codes (aesthetics) for Colleyville? |
| During
the recent election, now Mayor Joe Hocutt stated that potentially
the city may have to be more lenient when enforcing some
requirements because of a down economy.
This is exactly what we don't want
to do. This question drives to the heart of why the failure
to properly utilize the TIF funds is such a travesty. This is WHAT
the funds should have encouraged. That is, upgraded building
materials, design, and landscaping AND the city could
encourage the process through future rebates via the TIF.
The city council should have been conservative with TIF commitments and
been in a position to get more impact over a larger area of the
district.
Roof lines and the minimal aesthetics required under the code
would not be a tough sale, when the city was stepping up leading
by example.
The problem is Colleyville has a reputation as having inconsistent
city government (election every two years, typically out with the
old and in with the new. The only council member with more
than one year is Ginny Tigue. Ms. Tigue is not perceived as
a friendly by most commercial developers.) The ability to
discuss rational solutions has been drowned out by screams of
"big box, big box, 4 lane, 4 lane." Talk to
any commercial developer, other than Richard Myers and Raman
Chandler, and solicit their perception of Colleyville. If
you think quality businesses should come to Colleyville, I predict
you will not be happy. |
Newly sworn
in Mayor Joe Hocutt made a pledge that he would conduct the business of
the city in a civil and open fashion. If Mayor Hocutt lives up to his
campaign promises, then the city will be the better.
For the past three years, dissenting voices were branded as
alarmists. When pointing out the factual issues such as declining
sales taxes, illegal parkland swaps, questionable back door deals between
the Mayor and developers and the lack of commercial progress, LNO was
called "negative." The preferable approach was apparently to
ignore these facts and focus on the positive accomplishments, like the
new hotel. Are you still waiting for that one?
If one dared to suggest the library cost be limited to the $3 million in
the bank, they were obviously illiterate bumpkins that hated small
children. When suggesting the new Library consider state-of-the-art
computer facilities versus a 1940s style approach, the suggestion was met
with the people against COLD (computer oriented library design).
Rather than join in a positive effort to bring a unique feature such as
the Dairy Museum to Colleyville, is was ridiculed as wanting to put a "Cow
Museum" in town. There has never been a good deed go unpunished in
Colleyville. No room for thinking out of the box.
The question is, which has the more negative impact on the success of the
community....those pointing out the liars or those doing the lying?
The city is
fortunate to have the commercial real estate knowledge of Councilman Mark
Skinner, the financial knowledge of Councilman Elaine Dolan, the years of
public service and understanding of the park system of Councilman Rich
Hendler and what appears the steady, independent voice of Councilman Jon
Ayers.
Given the opportunity to function in a civil manner, the city will get the
best these people have. Should Mayor Hocutt adopt the
exclusionary approach of Mayor Pro Tem Ginny Tigue and former Mayor Donna
Arp, then it will be only a matter of time before the city is back in the paralysis
of polarization and mistrust.
Colleyville doesn't have much time to get it right. Communication and
civility should be displayed through committees and appointing board
members from all spectrums of local politics. It should not be difficult
to volunteer to be a part of city activities.
All elected officials should respond to all media, including LNO.
Communications, open discussions and acceptance of dissenting views may be
the only formula to finding innovative ways to set Colleyville on the path
of financial and community spirit salvation.
Front
Page| Contact
Us | Help |
©
2001-2003 Local News Only.com ™
Copyright - All Rights reserved |