P&Z Unanimously Denies Zoning Request for PUD-R on Cheek Sparger Road
Monday, November 18, 2001 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Dateline Colleyville: Monday November 18, 2001 10:19 AM P&Z Unanimously Denies Zoning Request for PUD-R on Cheek Sparger Road Commissioners
Jeff Wall, Bob Culley, Earl Swift, Mark Jones, Bud Sellers and Chairman
Gasper were present. Commissioner
Hollis was absent. Item 1The
Commission unanimously approved the residential zoning change from AG
(Agricultural) to R40 (Single Family Residential 40,000 Sq. Ft. Lot) at
5102 Montclair Drive requested by Donald Wilson.
Mr. Wilson and his family currently reside in Colleyville and
intend to build a new home at this location. Item 2The
Commission unanimously denied the controversial residential zoning change
from R20 (Single Family Residential 20,000 Sq. Ft. Lot) to PUD-R (Planned
Unit Development – Residential) requested by Claire Edwards located at
the corner of Cheek-Sparger and Acuff Lane.
Seven citizens spoke at the public hearing.
Four opposed the change and three were in favor of the change. Ms.
Edwards had requested the change in an effort to bring her home-based
accounting business into compliance with city code.
The requested PUD-R zoning, for which city staff recommended
approval, was designed to limit the amount of the residence that could be
used for the business, limit the parking area and limit signage for the
business to one square foot. Due to
the emotional nature of the previous hearing on this issue Charmin Gasper
gave the following comments prior to opening the public hearing: “The
Commission recognizes that Ms. Edwards has been an active contributing
member of our community. It
also recognizes that she has earned many professional recognitions.
The commission is aware that Ms. Edwards has many personal friends,
and business associates who can speak to her upstanding character and
contributions to our community. However,
the issue before this Commission is whether or not the ordinance proposed
by Ms. Edwards should be modified, and if modified what modifications.
And whether or not to recommend approval to the City Council. Since
the case pertains to a residential district, the Commission has an
obligation under the City’s Master Plan, to preserve the residential
character within this zoning district unless there is some compelling
public reason for the Commission to not follow the Master Plan. Therefore,
the Commission is specifically interested in comments which address the
issues surrounding whether or not the ordinance should be modified, any
modification which the public thinks should be made, and the reason that
the public support or does not support the proposed ordinance.” The
Master Plan, though frequently overruled by the City Council, serves as
the City’s guide in land use issues.
Even though the current Master Plan indicates future commercial
usage close to this neighborhood, area residents oppose any new commercial
zoning in this area citing concerns that Ms. Edwards business would
increase traffic on Cheek-Sparger and possibly increase crime due to the
commercial usage. The PUD
zoning has solved similar problems in other areas of the city such as the
Ritz property on Bransford and the Tom Miller property on Thompson
Terrace. This item is scheduled to go before City Council on December 4th. Item 3The
Commission approved the changes requested by City Council to the Land
Development Code by a vote of 5/1, with Chairman Gasper casting the
opposing vote. Previously
hotels and motels, drive-in restaurants, veterinary offices with kennels,
food caterers, motion picture theaters and building materials vendors with
outside storage were allowed by right in CC2 (Shopping Center).
The change passed by the Commission, if approved by Council, will
mean that approval by the City Council of an SUP (Special Use Permit) will
be required by any of these six uses, even in CC2 zoning.
This change to the ordinance places additional control in the hands
of City Council but also additional responsibility for fair and equitable
treatment of all parties. Item 4The
Commission passed a motion regarding changes to the collection of
perimeter street fees. City
Council had requested that the Commission review and update the current
procedures. For the past
decade perimeter street fees have been waived when a current Colleyville
resident chooses to subdivide their property into two lots only, in
particular when the subdivision is to provide a building lot for another
family member. Recent Council
review showed that over $1,000,000 in fees have been waived in the last
year. The
Commission is making a recommendation to Council that the City begin to
collect perimeter street fees for residential lots according to lot
frontage in linear feet. Estimated
Total Perimeter Street Costs equal $138.78 per foot.
In all
cases this recommendation preserves the waiver of perimeter street fees
for an owner occupied property with an existing structure when subdividing
into two lots only. The meeting was adjoined at 10:30 PM.
Copyright LNO 2001 - All Rights Reserved SEND AN EMAIL TO THE EDITORS Comments will be posted on Editor Emails unless otherwise requested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||